Contact Us
Home
Sitemap
Follow Us On
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
E i n s t e i n G r a v i t y . c o m
E i n s t e i n E l e c t r i c i t y . c o m E i n s t e i n G e o m e t r y . c o m E i n s t e i n L i g h t . c o m
E i n s t e i n M a g n e t i s m . c o m E i n s t e i n M a s s . c o m
Below is an image of Albert Einstein's
depiction of Gravity.
A curvature (dent) in what is portrayed to be "Space-Time".
And with no offense at all to Albert (a very keen man indeed);
The above is certainly the most
misconstrued and radically illogical image
ever to be presented in the history of science.
Why is this image completely illogical ?
1. The curvature (a characteristic of "Mass") is within a supposed non-Mass substance (space).
2. The pull upon the orbiting mass is downward not centerward. (The image is an attempt to explain a new Einsteinian wrong form of Gravity using a previous and equally wrong Newtonian form of Gravity).
3. If the orbit of the smaller mass disappeared, the smaller mass would end up at the bottom of the larger mass, not where it scientifically should end up, inside the true "center" of the larger mass.
4. If the above "warpage" can cause a "force" upon mass, then that same warpage must also then cause a force against the orbiting planet. That means that as a planet orbits, as it moves along and is continually warping space, that warping must be pushing back against the planet as it orbits. This would then cause a swift end to any orbit. Just like the plow on the front of a snowplow causing a force against the truck itself. The truck cannot bend the snow on the street in front of it without that force slowing the truck down.
5. There is no explanation for "continuous orbit". If the small mass is the moon, there is no reason for it to continue in orbit. Only the true definition of Gravity (The Expansion Acceleration of Mass) contains the answer to any particle having a continuous orbit.
6. This image (theory) only works for the bottom half of the large mass. A scientific demand is that the mass of the sun is also warping the space-time above the sun. If the warpage was present above the sun as well, the forces of Gravity within the two dents would cancel each other out. Also, a huge blatant error, imagine the top gravitational dent being placed over the sun to form a complete discus shape of gravity around the sun. Now if an object approached the sun from its top or its bottom the gravity field would be completely different from an object approaching it from the side (the depiction below may be a bit rough but you can certainly gather the understanding).
Someone may argue that the gravitational dent would be "round" however that would completely misconstrue the true fact that Gravity obeys the inverse square law of Distance. A round dent would not accommodate the fact that Gravity gets less2 as you move away (as is depicted by a dish shape).
7. Newton's Gravity "somehow" physically reaches through space (nothingness) to mystically "grab" onto and hold a planet in orbit. Einstein's Gravity warps (nothingness) to push (using no mass) on a planet to grab onto it and hold it in orbit.
Newton's Gravity is illogical.
Einstein's Gravity is doubly illogical.
Newton's Gravity completely contradicts his very own first fundamental Law (You cannot break fundamental Laws). As the apple broke away from the tree, there was absolutely no Mass acting upon the apple. Newton declared that movement comes from force and force means a Mass physically acting upon the initial mass.
Even though Newton didn't adhere to his very own Law doesn't mean that you should also make the same mistake.
When Newton's apple separated, not due to any force, but simply due to the stem dying and disintegrating, as the apple then finally separated from the tree it absolutely
did not begin to fall downward !
Why ?
1. Because Newton's first and fundamentally unbreakable Law declares that it must remain at rest.
2. There was no Mass acting upon it.
3. Gravity is a pushing force not a pulling force.
After separation from the tree, as Newton's apple was left floating in space, it was simply later struck by the Expansion Acceleration of the earth.
Plain and simple, Pure and True Physics.
And likewise, Einstein's Gravity (the proposed warpage of space-time) however sincere it may be, attempts to create a "Force" apart from Mass x Acceleration.
You cannot break fundamental Laws.
The Unification of Gravity with Einstein’s E=mc2
was discovered by
See the complete and amazing story at
© Copyright All Rights Reserved EinsteinGravity.com 2008