C.3.1 WILL THE REAL HERETICS PLEASE STAND UP

David W. Bercot, Will The Real Heretics Please Stand Up: A New Look at Today’s Evangelical Church in the Light of Early Christianity, 3rd. edition (Tyler TX: Scroll Publishing, 1999): 56-68
[incidentally, since I'm reprinting this excerpt, the least I can do is put in a plug for the book in a commercial way by providing the link to Bercot's publishing company website. Make sure you order the 3rd edition, though -- I understand there are considerable additions from previous editions - MAS]

C.3.1.1.1 [Chapter 6] What They Believed About Salvation

[56]
When I first began studying the early Christian writings, ) was surprised by what I read. In fact, after a few days of reading, I put their writings back on the shelf and decided to scrap my research altogether. After analyzing the situation, I realized the problem was that their writings contradicted many of my own theological views.

This is not to say that I found no support for any of my beliefs in the early Christian writings. Their understandings corroborated many of my views. On the other hand, they frequently taught the opposite of what I believed, and they even labelled some of my beliefs as heretical. The same would probably hold true of many of your beliefs.


To illustrate, these next few chapters discuss five beliefs that were accepted by the entire early church. These five examples are not the hardest of their beliefs for us 1) accept, but neither are they the easiest. You may find that you agree with their views on some of these matters, but it's unlikely that you'll agree on all of them. Please understand that I'm not asking you to accept their teachings on these matters. I'm only asking you to hear them out.

C.3.1.1.2 [57] Are We Saved By Faith Alone?

If there's any single doctrine that we would expect to find the faithful associates of the apostles teaching, it's the doctrine of salvation by faith alone. After all, that is the cornerstone doctrine of the Reformation. In fact, we frequently say that persons who don't hold to this doctrine aren't really Christians.


The story we usually hear about church history is that the early Christians taught our doctrine of salvation by faith alone. But after Constantine corrupted the church, it gradually began to teach that works play a role in our salvation. Fairly typical of the scenario painted is the following passage from Francis Schaeffer's How Should We ThenLive? After describing the fall of the Roman Empire and the decline of learning in the West, Schaeffer wrote: "Thanks to the monks, the Bible was preserved—along with sections of Greek and Latin classics.... Nevertheless, the pristine Christianity set forth in the New Testament gradually became distorted. A humanistic element was added: Increasingly, the authority of the church took precedence over the teaching of the Bible. And there was an ever growing emphasis on salvation as resting on man's meriting the merit of Christ, instead of on Christ's work alone.”[1]


Like Schaeffer, most evangelical writers give the impression that the belief that our own merits and works affect our salvation was something that gradually crept into the church after the time of Constantine and the fall of Rome. But that's not really the case.


The early Christians universally believed that works or obedience play an essential role in our salvation. This is probably quite a shocking revelation to most evangelicals. But that there's no room for doubt concerning this matter, I have quoted below (in approximate chronological order) from early Christian writers of virtually every generation—from the time of the Apostle John to the inauguration of Constantine:


[58]

Clement of Rome, who was a companion of the apostle Paul[2] and overseer of the church in Rome, wrote, "It is necessary, therefore, that we be prompt in the practice of good works. For He forewarns us, 'Behold, the Lord comes and His reward is before His face, to render to every man according to his work.' ... Let us therefore earnestly strive to be found in the number of those who wait for Him, in order that we may share in His promised reward. But how, beloved ones, shall we do this? By fixing our thoughts on God by faith. By earnestly seeking the things that are pleasing and acceptable to Him. By doing the things that are in harmony with His blameless will. And by following the way of truth, casting away from us all unrighteousness and sin.”[3]


Polycarp, the personal companion of the apostle John, taught, "He who raised Him up from the dead will also raise us up—if we do Hiswillandwalkin His commandments and love what He loved, keeping ourselves from all unrighteousness."[4]


The letter of Barnabas .states: "He who keeps these [commandments], will be glorified in the kingdom of God; but he who chooses other things will be destroyed with his works.”[5]


Hermas, who wrote sometime between the years 100 and 140, stated, "Only those who fear the Lord and keepHis commandments have life with God. But as to those who do not keep His commandments, there is no life in them.... All, therefore, who despise Him and do not follow His commands deliver themselves to death, and each will be guilty of his own blood. But I implore you to obey His commands,and youwillhavea cure for yourformersins”[6]


In his first apology, written sometime before 150 A.D., Justin Martyr told the Romans, "We have been taught, ..that He accepts only those who imitate the virtues that reside in Him—self restraint, justice, and love of mankind.... And so we have received [this teaching] that if men bytheirworksshowthemselves worthy ofHis design, they are deemed worthy of


[59] reigning in company with Him, being delivered from corruption and suffering."[7]


Clement of Alexandria, writing in about 190, said, "The Word, having unveiled the truth, showed to men the summit of salvation, so that either repenting they might be saved, or refusing to obey, they might be condemned. This is the proclamation of righteousness: to those who obey, rejoicing; to those who disobey, condemnation.”[8] And again, "Whoever obtains [the truth] and distinguisheshimselfingoodworks shall gain the prize of everlasting life.... Some people correctly and adequately understand how [God provides necessary power], but attaching slight importance to the works that lead to salvation, they fail to make the necessary preparation for attaining the objects of their hope."[9]


Origen, who lived in the early 200s, wrote, "The soul... [will] be rewarded according to what it deserves, being destined to obtain either an inheritance of eternal life and blessedness, if its actions shallhaveprocuredthisfor it, or to be delivered up to eternal fire and punishments, if the guilt of its crimes shall have brought it down to this."[10]


Hippolytus, a Christian overseer who lived at the same time as Origen, wrote, "The Gentiles, by faith in Christ, prepare for themselves eternal life throughgood works'[11] He again wrote, "[Jesus], in administering the righteous judgment of the Father to all, assigns to each what is righteous according tohisworks.... Justification will be seen in the awarding to each that which is just; to those who have done well, there will be justly assigned eternal happiness. The lovers of wickedness will be assigned eternal punishment.... But the righteous will remember only the righteous deeds by which they reached the heavenly kingdom.”[12] Cyprian wrote, "To prophesy, to cast out demons, and to do great acts upon the earth are certainly a sublime and admirable thing. However, a person does not attain the Kingdom of Heaven even though he is found in all these things unless he



[60]walksintheobservance ofthe right andjust way. The Lord says, 'Many will say to me in that day. Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed other powerful works in your name? And then I will confess to them, I never knew you. Depart from me you workers of evil.' [Matt. 7:22,23] There is need of righteousness so one may deserve well of God the Judge. Wemustobey His preceptsandwarnings thatour meritsmay receivetheir reward."'[13] Finally, Lactantius, writing in the early 300s, explained to the Romans, "Why, then, did He make [man] frail and mortal?...[So] He might set before man virtue, that is, endurance of evils and labours, by which he might be abletogainthereward of immortality. For since man consists of two parts, body and soul, of which the one is earthly, the other heavenly, two lives have been assigned to man. The first, which is appointed for the body, is transitory. The other, which belongs to the soul, is everlasting. We received the first at our birth. We attain to the latter by striving, that immortality might not be available to man without some difficulties.... For this reason He has given us this present life, that wemayeither lose the trueandeternal lifebyour sins, orwin itby ourvirtue."'[14]


In fact, every early Christian writer who discussed the subject of salvation presented this same view.

C.3.1.1.3 [60] Does This Mean That Christians Earn Their Salvation by Works?

No, the early Christians did not teach that we earn salvation by an accumulation of good works. They recognized and emphasized the fact that faith is absolutely essential for salvation, and that without God's grace nobody can be saved.
[61] All of the writers quoted above stressed this fact. Here are just a few examples:


Clement of Rome wrote, "[We] are not justified by ourselves. Nor by our own wisdom, understanding, godliness, or works done in holiness of heart. But by that faith through which Almighty God has justified all men since the beginning.'"[15]


Polycarp wrote, "Many desire to enter into this joy, knowing that 'bygrace you are saved, not of works,' but by the will of God through Jesus Christ [Eph. 2:81."'[16]


Bamabas wrote, 'To this end the Lord delivered up His flesh to corruption, that we might be sanctified through the remission of sins, which is effected by His blood.[17]


Justin Martyr wrote, "Our suffering and crucified Christ was not cursed by the law. Rather, he made it manifest that He alone would save those who do not depart from His faith.... As the blood of the passover saved those who were in Egypt, so also the blood of Christ will deliver from death those who have believed."[18] Clement of Alexandria wrote, "It follows that there is one unchangeable gift of salvation given by one God, through one Lord, benefiting in many”[19]And again, "Abraham was not justified by works, but by faith [Rom. 4:3]. Therefore, even if they do good works now, it is of no advantage to them after death, if they do not have faith."[20] Are Faith And Works Mutually Exclusive? You may be saying to yourself, "I'm confused. Out of one side of their mouths they say we are saved because of our works, and out of the other side they say we are saved by faith or grace. They don't seem to know what they believed!"


Oh, but they did. Our problem is that Augustine, Luther, and other Western theologians have convinced us that there's an


[62]irreconcilable conflict between salvation based on grace and salvation conditioned on works or obedience. They have used a fallacious form of argumentation known as the "false dilemma," by asserting that there are only two possibilities regarding salvation: it's either (1) a gift from God or (2) it's something we earn by our works.


The early Christians would have replied that a gift is no less a gift simply because it's conditioned on obedience. Suppose a king asked his son to go to the royal orchard and bring back a basket full of the king's favourite apples. After the son had complied, suppose the king gave his son half of his kingdom. Was the reward a gift, or was it something the son had earned? The answer is that it was a gift. The son obviously didn't earn half of his father's kingdom by performing such a small task. The fact that the gift was conditioned on the son's obedience doesn't change the fact that it was still a gift.


The early Christians believed that salvation is a gift from God but that God gives His gift to whomever He chooses. And Hechooses togiveitto those wholove andobey him.


Is their understanding really that strange? I so often hear evangelical Christians say that welfare should only be given to those persons who are truly deserving. When they say that certain poor persons are "deserving," do they mean that welfare constitutes wages earned by such persons? Of course not. They still consider welfare to be a gift. Simply because a person is selective in his giving, it doesn't change the gift into a wage.

C.3.1.1.4 [62] Yes, But the Bible Says…

Recently when I was explaining the early Christians' understanding of salvation to a group of believers, one of the ladies was a bit disturbed. She exclaimed in annoyance, "It sounds to me like they needed to read their Bibles more!"

[63] But the early Christians did read their Bibles. As Josh McDowell points out in Evidence That Demandsa Verdict:


J. Harold Greenlee says that the quotations of the Scripture in the works of the early Christian writers "are so extensive that the N. T. [New Testament] could virtually be reconstructed from them without the use of New Testament manuscripts." . . .


Clement of Alexandria (A.D.150-212). 2,400 of his quotes are from all but three books of the New Testament.


Tertullian (A.D.160-220) was a presbyter of the Church in Carthage and quotes the New Testament more than 7,000 times, of which 3,800 are from the Gospels....


Geisler and Nix rightly conclude that "a brief inventory at this point will reveal that there were some 32,000 citations of the New Testament prior to the time of the Council of Nicaea (325).”[21]


So please don't accuse the early Christians of not reading their Bibles. These Christians were well aware of what Paul had written concerning salvation and grace. After all, Paul personally taught men like Clement of Rome. However, the early Christians didn't put Paul's letters to the Romans and the Galatians on a pedestal above the teachings of Jesus and the other apostles. They read Paul's words about grace in conjunction with such other Scriptures as:



[64]life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation" (John 5:28,29).

Other Scripture passages they cited are listed at the end of this chapter.

So the real issue isn't a matter of believing the Scriptures, but one of interpreting the Scriptures. The Bible says that "by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast" (Eph. 2:8,9). And yet the Bible also says, "You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only" (Jas. 2:24). Our doctrine of salvation accepts that first statement but essentially nullifies the second. The early Christian doctrine of salvation gives equal weight to both.


As was pointed out earlier, the early Christians didn't believe that man is totally depraved and incapable of doing any good. They taught that humans are capable of obeying and loving God. But they also believed that for a person to live obediently throughout his entire life, he needs God's power. In short, obedience isn't totally dependent on human strength, nor is it totally a product of God's power alone. It is a mixture of both.


To them, salvation was similar. The new birth as spiritual sons of God and heirs of the promise of eternal life is offered to all of us purely as a matter of grace. We do not have to be "good enough" first. We do not have to earn this new birth in any way. And we do not have to atone for all the sins we have


[65] committed in our past. The slate is wiped clean through God's grace. We are truly saved by grace, not by works, as Paul said.


Nevertheless, we also play a role in our own salvation according to Scripture and the early Christians. First, we have to repent and to believe in Christ as our Lord and Saviour in order to avail ourselves of God's grace. After receiving the new birth, we also have to obey Christ. Yet, obedience itself is still dependent on the continuing grace of God's power and forgiv ness. So salvation begins and ends with grace, but in the middle is man's faithful and obedient response. Ultimately, salvation depends on both man and God. For this reason, James could say we are saved by works and not by faith alone.

C.3.1.1.5 [65] Can a Saved Person Be Lost?

Since the early Christians believed that our continued faith and obedience are necessary for salvation, it naturally follows that they believed that a "saved" person could still end up being lost. For example, Irenaeus, the pupil of Polycarp, wrote, "Christ will not die again on behalf of those who now commit sin because death shall no more have dominion over Him.... Therefore we should not be puffed up.... But we should beware lest somehow, after [we have come to] the knowledge of Christ, if we do things displeasing to God, we obtain no further forgiveness of sins but rather be shut out from His”[22] (Heb. 6:46).

Tertullian wrote, "Some people act as though God were under an obligation to bestow even on the unworthy His intended gift. They turn His liberality into slavery.... For do not many afterwards all out of grace?Isnotthisgift taken away from many?”[23]


Cyprian told his fellow believers, "It is written, 'He who endures to the end, the same shall be saved' [Matt. 10:22]. So whatever precedes the end is only a step by which we ascend to


[66]the summit of salvation. It is not the final point wherein we have already gained the full result of the the ascent.”[24]


One of the Scripture passages that the early Christians frequently cited is Hebrews 10:26: "If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left." Our preachers usually tell us that the writer of Hebrews wasn't talking about saved persons. If that's the case, the writer certainly didn't communicate it very effectively to his readers. All the early Christians understood this passage to be talking about persons who had been saved.


Incidentally, some of the quotations from the early Christians might make you think that they lived in eternal insecurity. But that's not the case. Although they believed that their heavenly Father could disinherit them if He chose to do so, the overall spirit of their writings show that obedient Christians didn't live with a constant morbid dread of being disinherited. Does an obedient son constantly worry and fret over the possibility of being disinherited by his earthly father?

C.3.1.1.6 [66] The Group That Preached Salvation by Grace Alone?


As surprising as all of this may be to you, what I'm about to tell you is even more bizarre. There was a religious group, labelled as heretics by the early Christians, who strongly disputed the church's stance on salvation and works. Instead, they taught that man is totally depraved. That we are saved solely by grace. That works play no role in our salvation. And that we cannot lose our salvation once we obtain it.

I know what you're thinking: This group of "heretics" were the real Christians and the "orthodox" Christians were really heretics. But such a conclusion is impossible. I say it's impossible because the group I'm referring to are the Gnostics. The Greek word gnosis means knowledge, and the Gnostics claimed


[67] that God had revealed special knowledge to them that the main body of Christians did not have. Although each Gnostic teacher had his individual version of teachings, they all basically taught that the Creator was a different God than the Father of Jesus. This inferior God had acted without the authority of the Father in creating the material world. This Creator botched things up and man is inherently depraved as a result. The God of the Old Testament is this inferior Creator who possesses different qualities from the God of the New Testament.


Because humans are the flawed work of this inferior God, they are totally unable to do anything toward their own salvation. Fortunately for mankind, the Father of Jesus took pity on humans and sent his Son for our salvation. However, because the flesh is inherently depraved, the Son could not have actually become a man. Rather, the Son of God simply took on the appearance of man. He was not truly man, and He never really died or was resurrected. Since everything about man is inherently flawed, our works can play no part in our salvation, but rather we are saved purely by the grace of the Father."'


In case you have any lingering doubts on whether the Gnostics were true Christians, notice what the Apostle John himself said about them: "Many deceivers have gone out into the world who do notconfess JesusChristascoming in theflesh.This is a deceiver and an antichrist" (2 John 7). The Gnostics were the ones who denied that Jesus had come in the flesh, and they are the ones to whom John was referring. He made it clear that they were deceivers and antichrists.


So, if our evangelical doctrine of salvation is true, we are faced with the uncomfortable reality that this doctrine was taught by "deceivers and antichrists" before it was taught by the church.


The early Christian understanding of salvation was also based on these passages, among others: "Let us not grow weary while doing good, for in due season we shall reap if we do not lose heart" (Gal.


[68] 6:9 "For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, accordingto whathehasdone. whether good or bad"(2 Cor 5: 0)."For this we know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God" (Eph. 5:5). "If we endure, we shall also reign with Him. If we deny Him, He also will deny us"(2 Tim. 2:12). "Let us therefore be diligent to enter that rest, lest anyone fall after the same example of disobedience" (Heb. 4:11)."You have need of endurance, so that after you have done the will of God, you may receive the promise"(Heb. 10:36)."lf they have escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and are again entangled in it and overcome, they are worse off at the end than they were at the beginning. It would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than to have known it and then to turn their backs on the sacred command that was passed on to them" (2 Pet. 2:20,21 NIV).


"If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love" (John 15:10). "If you abide in My word, you are my disciples indeed" (John 8:31). "lf anyone keeps Myword, he will never see death"(John 8:51). "He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on the left. Then the King will say to those on his right hand, 'Come, you blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink'" (Matt. 25:33-35).


"I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away. ...If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned" (John 15:1,6). "He will render to every man according to his works: to those who by patience in welldoing seek for glory and honour and immortality, he will give eternal life" (Rom. 2:6,7 RSV). "By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain" (I Cor. 15:2 NIV). "See that you do not refuse Him who speaks. For if they did not escape who refused Him who spoke on earth, much more shall we not escape if we turn away from Him who speaks from heaven" (Heb. 12:25). "Blessed is the man who endures temptation; for when he has been proved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him" (Jas. 1:12).

C.3.1.1.7 Notes



[1]Francis A. Schaeffer, How Should We Then Live? (Old Tappan NJ: Fleming H. Revell, 1976): 31, 32.
[2]“In the twelfth year of the same reign Clement succeeded Anencletus after the latter had been overseer of the church of Rome for twelve years. The apostle in his Epistle to the Philippians informs us that this Clement was his fellow-worker. His words are as follows: ‘With Clement and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the book of life.’ There is extant an epistle of this Clement which is acknowledged to be genuine.” Eusebius History of the Church bk. 3, chaps. 15, 16.
Irenaeus wrote about Clement, “This man, as he had seen the blessed apostles, and had been been conversant with them, might be said to have the preaching of the apostles still echoing (in his ears), and their traditions before his eyes.” (IrenaeusHeresies bk. , chap. 3, sec. 3.
Clement of Alexandria treated the Letter to the Corinthians by Clement of Rome as Scripture and referred to the writer as “the apostle Clement,” Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies bk. 4, chap. 17.
Origendescribes Clement as “a disciple of the apostles.” Origen First Things bk. 2, chap. 3, sec. 6.

“(A.D. 30-100) Clement was probably a Gentile and a Roman. He seems to have been at Philippi with St. Paul (A.D. 57) when that first-born of the Western churches was passing through great trials of faith.” A. Cleveland Coxe, The Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1, Introductory Note to the First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians (Grand Rapids MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1985): 1.

“Clement, a name of great celebrity in antiquity, was a disciple of Paul and Peter, to whom he refers as the chief examples for imitation.” Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, vol. 2 (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1910): 637.

[3]Clement of Rome, Letter to the Corinthians, chaps. 34, 35.
[4]Polycarp, “Letter to the Philippians”, chap. 2
[5]Barnabas, “Letter of Barnabas” chap. 21.
[6]Hermas, “Shepherd” bk. 2, comm.. 7: bk. 3, sim. 10, chap. 2
[7]Justin, First Apology, chap. 10
[8]“Exhortation to the Heathen”, chap. 11.
[9]Clement, “Rich Man”, chaps. 1, 2.
[10]Origen, “Of First Things” preface, chap. 5.
[11]Hippolytus, “Fragments from Commentaries ‘On Proverbs.’”
[12]Hippolytus, “Against Plato” sec. 3.
[13]Cyprian, “Unity of the Church” sec. 15.
[14]LactantiusInastitutes” bk. 7, chap. 5.
[15]Clement of Rome, “Corinthians” chap. 32.
[16]Polycarp, “Philippians” chap. 1.
[17]Barnabas, “Letter” chap. 5.
[18]Justin, “Trypho” chap. 111.
[19]Clement, “Miscellanies” bk. 6, chap. 13.
[20]Ibid., bk. 1, chap. 7
[21]Josh McDowell, Evidence that Demands a Verdict: *San Bernardino CA: Here’s Life Publishers, 1972): 50-52.
[22]Irenaeus, “Against Heresies”, bk. 4, chap. 27, sec. 2.
[23]Tertullian, “On Repentance” chap. 6.
[24]Cyprian, “Unity of the Church” sec. 21.